Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 03:50

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Satellites keep breaking up in space, insurance won't cover them. - Space
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What AI tool can be used to write exactly in the human writing style?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What kind of person does a narcissist hate?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Dana White names the only fighter Jon Jones ever ducked and it’s not Tom Aspinall - Bloody Elbow
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Tesla is forced to remove 64 Superchargers on NJ Turnpike, Musk claims ‘corruption’ - Electrek